Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

(DOWNLOAD) "State Missouri v. Honorable Charles E." by Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

State Missouri v. Honorable Charles E.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: State Missouri v. Honorable Charles E.
  • Author : Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc
  • Release Date : January 13, 1964
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 64 KB

Description

Mandamus. Relator herein is defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries entitled "John Lee Kelley, Plaintiff,
v. Frank Hudson, Defendant," pending in the Circuit Court of Lawrence County, of which respondent is the Judge. On application
of relator our alternative writ of mandamus was issued to respondent to show cause why he should not require the plaintiff
in said action to answer separately and fully in writing, under oath and duly signed, certain written interrogatories served
upon him under Civil Rules 56.01 and 57.01 of this court, as found in 4 RSMo 1959, pp. 4975 and 4976, and Vernon's Ann. Mo.
Rules (41-82 V.A.M.R.), pp. 188 and 195. The petition in the action brought against relator seeks to recover from relator $35,000 for alleged personal injuries allegedly
caused by and resulting from the collision of an automobile in which plaintiff was riding and an automobile driven by relator.
It alleges specific negligence on the part of relator in failing to exercise the highest degree of care in the operation of
said automobile in failing to keep a vigilant lookout, driving at an excessive rate of speed, driving in excess of 65 miles
per hour and in failing to drive on the right half of the highway, as a direct and proximate result of which plaintiff allegedly
was severely injured in his head, limbs, back, spine, neck, shoulders, chest, abdomen, internal organs and all parts of his
body, which said injuries, it is alleged, are permanent and progressive; and that, as is further alleged, plaintiff has necessarily
expended large sums of money for medical, hospital and nursing services, and for medicines, x-rays and drugs; to which petition
relator has filed answer denying said allegations.


PDF Ebook Download "State Missouri v. Honorable Charles E." Online ePub Kindle